bobplum

  • Posts: 5602
Re: futility of the WFP brush
« Reply #20 on: October 02, 2018, 09:01:44 pm »

alank

  • Posts: 640
Re: futility of the WFP brush
« Reply #21 on: October 02, 2018, 09:07:47 pm »
That looks the business bob :D

paul alan

  • Posts: 1683
Re: futility of the WFP brush
« Reply #22 on: October 02, 2018, 09:15:32 pm »

maybe one of these

That look's mean, did you have to order from oversea's for that Bob?


I remember trying your other one and wasn't too impressed with it but I like the look of that thing, is it heavy?

dazmond

  • Posts: 23610
Re: futility of the WFP brush
« Reply #23 on: October 02, 2018, 09:47:06 pm »
anything that adds time like swapping brushes is not for me.....that constructor brush will be too heavy on the end of an xtreme pole for sure.....
price higher/work harder!

Re: futility of the WFP brush
« Reply #24 on: October 02, 2018, 10:07:37 pm »
Tried the gardiners scraper and didn't get on with it. I'd find it would get in the way on a lot of my jobs and wasn't something I could keep on the brush/gooseneck all the time. Too much faff to add or remove.
I found glueing thin strips of non scratch scourer or the rougher side of velcro on to the ends of the stock very handy for stubborn birds mess or little yellow bug spots. As gardiner brush stocks have got thinner though, its tricky to do now.