If you don't pay for a taxi, yu have taken a percunary advantage and can get done for it. Why is it not the same for us? DAI
That's an interesting question Dai.
Unpaid bills are normally regarded as a civil matter rather than a police matter yet I believe that people who haven't paid taxi fares have been prosecuted under criminal law.
I will post this into a newsgroup called uk.legal to see what they've got to say about it and if I get a response I will post it here.
I have just posted the following to the uk.legal newsgroup
QUOTE
Hi.
I may be wrong but I believe that I've seen several accounts in local newspapers over the years of people being prosecuted for not paying their taxi fares. Now I always believed that non-payment of bills was a civil matter rather than criminal. For instance, I am a window cleaner and sometimes incur bad debts (thankfully very few and generally for quite small amounts). I find it easier to just try collecting it several times and just move on if I fail to do so. Indeed, if it's a bad paying job, I find it easier to move on anyway with little attempt to collect payment.
So what is the difference between a taxi fare and, for instance, my window cleaning bill legally? I wouldn't dream of involving the police in such a situation. Indeed, I know they wouldn't be interested anyway.
Is there some technical legal difference why a taxi fare is treated differently from non payment of other services? Presumably there is so could someone in the know explain it?
Thank you.
UNQUOTE