No offense but I dont see it. It isnt a valid point at all.
I see what I ALWAYS see when this is talked about. People rubbishing a company for doing something good.
You're gonna tell me it would be better if ionic had not done it?
Dude chill, I am not knocking Ionics at all, I think what they are doing is a good thing a little over priced maybe but good all the same, my point is I see so many people bang on about inoics are crash tested which as far as I know is 30 mph, my point is what about 40 50 60 70 mph it is not tested, if you drive round at 30 everywhere then they are great if not then the high price for the same system with cheaper running costs has got to be a better option.
Thsi is my point and I think it is a valid one..
I am not taking away what Ionics have done, more that I have a point on price and the safety goes out of the windows over 30 mph with ionics but the cost does not do down.
Ian
p.s
editing was due to editting in your post m8 people that can not afford it :
was edited, what I said was in reply to the post was Ionics crash test as far as I am aware at 30 mph, so at 40 50 60 70 80 it is not aplicable but the price does not come down and saying that meanings that other are IMO better because they do not have the high maintenence fees of Ionics due to there resin vessles ect that have to be filled by them (as far as I am aware dont quote me but I think this true)unless you know how to convert as many will not know on here, Tennant I do not need to hide a thing I say m8, I am upfront and to the point with what I say m8 always have been always will be. I feel you cant back up what I am saying on the crash test side apart from some is better than none which I agree with you on but as I said at 40 50 60 70 80 is is not tested so should you not pay a normal fee for a bit of metal a pump and plastic tank ?, I know you have a new system and I am pleased for you, nor and am I taking anything away from you as I think it looks great, but I am giving my view like it or not as you do.