Gav Camm lammy 283

  • Posts: 7520
Re: vauxhall vivaro
« Reply #20 on: December 03, 2010, 04:54:46 pm »
cant like it that much then
LET YOUR PANES BE MY PLEASURE

"If CALSBERG did WINDOW CLEANING
 it would be C.C.C  Probably the best WINDOW CLEANERS IN THE WORLD ..........."

SB Cleaning

  • Posts: 4237
Re: vauxhall vivaro
« Reply #21 on: December 03, 2010, 04:59:54 pm »
Yawn. Well...when me or anyone I know has anything but joy from them I'll let you know... ;)
just hope yr still singing its
praises once youve ad half the trouble iv had
wiv one  >:( >:(
I'm not going to have that trouble. For a start I trust it completely, and also it's going in in april anyway.
How can you possibly say you ain't gonna have any trouble with it?

Sir Squeaky

  • Posts: 8341
Re: vauxhall vivaro
« Reply #22 on: December 03, 2010, 05:09:57 pm »
cant like it that much then
??? Don't follow, sorry.

How can you possibly say you ain't gonna have any trouble with it?
Because it's smooth as silk. Nothing on the verge of breaking at all. It was serviced and they said it was A1 as it left the factory.

Gav Camm lammy 283

  • Posts: 7520
Re: vauxhall vivaro
« Reply #23 on: December 03, 2010, 05:19:14 pm »
its going in april
LET YOUR PANES BE MY PLEASURE

"If CALSBERG did WINDOW CLEANING
 it would be C.C.C  Probably the best WINDOW CLEANERS IN THE WORLD ..........."

Sir Squeaky

  • Posts: 8341
Re: vauxhall vivaro
« Reply #24 on: December 03, 2010, 05:20:37 pm »
its going in april
Yeah because it'll be 4 years old and I'm getting a new one.

Gav Camm lammy 283

  • Posts: 7520
Re: vauxhall vivaro
« Reply #25 on: December 03, 2010, 05:26:14 pm »
the new ones r a lot better
its pre 05 where the problems lie
LET YOUR PANES BE MY PLEASURE

"If CALSBERG did WINDOW CLEANING
 it would be C.C.C  Probably the best WINDOW CLEANERS IN THE WORLD ..........."

Sir Squeaky

  • Posts: 8341
Re: vauxhall vivaro
« Reply #26 on: December 03, 2010, 05:27:06 pm »
the new ones r a lot better
its pre 05 where the problems lie
Correct.

Gav Camm lammy 283

  • Posts: 7520
Re: vauxhall vivaro
« Reply #27 on: December 03, 2010, 05:27:47 pm »
n mines a 03  >:( >:( >:(
LET YOUR PANES BE MY PLEASURE

"If CALSBERG did WINDOW CLEANING
 it would be C.C.C  Probably the best WINDOW CLEANERS IN THE WORLD ..........."

Sir Squeaky

  • Posts: 8341
Re: vauxhall vivaro
« Reply #28 on: December 03, 2010, 05:28:28 pm »
Ah... :-\

poole bay

  • Posts: 644
Re: vauxhall vivaro
« Reply #29 on: December 03, 2010, 10:35:22 pm »
what before you get any trouble lol ;) good lad dont blame you

kendrick

  • Posts: 115
Re: vauxhall vivaro
« Reply #30 on: December 06, 2010, 10:15:17 pm »
so wot do u think is best vivaro or new shape dispatch

Sir Squeaky

  • Posts: 8341
Re: vauxhall vivaro
« Reply #31 on: December 06, 2010, 10:18:27 pm »
so wot do u think is best vivaro or new shape dispatch
I wouldn't personally want a Citreon, but it's quite a nice looking van. Won't drive as nice as Vivaro though. Not a lot does.

Steve_c

Re: vauxhall vivaro
« Reply #32 on: December 06, 2010, 10:21:32 pm »
Ask the bfg what he thinks of vivaro's he's on his 3rd gear box.

Re: vauxhall vivaro
« Reply #33 on: December 07, 2010, 07:17:21 am »
I have read about these problems and would only like to make one observation all carry very heavy weight which is unstable at most time. This would put pressure on the clutch, brakes and gearbox.

Paul Coleman

Re: vauxhall vivaro
« Reply #34 on: December 07, 2010, 07:45:40 am »
I have read about these problems and would only like to make one observation all carry very heavy weight which is unstable at most time. This would put pressure on the clutch, brakes and gearbox.

I have an 03 Trafic (same as Vivaro) and I had a gearbox replaced at 39,000 miles.  Lucky it went so soon as it was still under warranty (I bought it at 37,000 miles).  The van has now done nearly 90k.  The list of issues is screen washer pump around 50k, clutch around 75k (fair enough I suppose) and the slave cylinder tends to be changed with the clutch anyway, steering pump around 50k.
The issue with the gearbox is not about load strain.  It's about the gear selection mechanism.  Apparently, where the cable enters at the bottom of the gearbox, there is inadequate sealing to stop water getting in.  This leads to a bearing becoming corroded and wearing prematurely.  Whoever designed it that way wants shooting.  I certainly hope they at least got sacked - and I'm normally quite a forgiving person.  My understanding is that from around the 55 plate onwards, they were made with more protection to stop water entering.  I also notice from the records that the master cylinder on my van was changed before I had it.
I did wonder for a while if I had bought a lemon but since a number of faults occurring, it's not been too bad since.  The MOT bill last year was about £300 (including the test) but bits need replacing on steering and suspension from time to time.  I accept that as fairly normal wear and tear.  It's major parts wearing prematurely due to crap design that I find irritating.  It's not as if diesel powered vans are a new concept.